Batch history and plant know-how in one place.
Seula compares each batch with the reactor's own usual batch. Known problems and what was done about them are written down, so when something similar comes up again, the earlier case is there to look at.
Uses the data the plant already has
The historian, the batch system, the lab results and the shift log. No new sensors are needed.
Each batch against the usual
Each batch is compared with the reactor's usual batch, phase by phase: which phase ran long, which was skipped, which batches differ. Lab results and the plant's own rules are checked as well.
Earlier cases alongside
A finding is compared with the problems recorded for the plant. If one matches, it shows what to check and what was done last time. In Finnish or English.
Questions about a batch
You can ask how a batch differed from the good ones. The assistant looks at the data, the notes, the lab results and the procedures, and shows where each answer comes from.
Notes and experience kept
Shift logs, work orders and manuals can be imported as they are. Engineers mark whether a suggestion was right, so the record gets better over time.
What it looks like
The pictures are from Lumiranta, a fictional demo plant.
Seula is new
We are looking for one or two batch plants to develop it with. Starting doesn't need a connection to the plant: the data can be sent as files.
- First
A conversation
We show the demo and hear what your process and data are like. If it doesn't look useful, that is fine to say.
- Then
Data as files
A year of historian export, the tag list and the batch log, plus notes and lab results if you have them. An NDA is signed first. The data goes on a separate server in Helsinki.
- Together
Going through it
We look at the findings with your engineer and drop what you already knew.
- After
Feedback
What was useful and what wasn't. That decides what we build next.
Get in touch
If you run a batch process and this sounds interesting, or you would just like to see the demo, send a message.